Magnecule-Generating Process is Over Unity

ARICA, CHILE; August 30, 31, 2006 -- I am a regular visitor to PES Network websites, and I just read your article pertaining Dr. Santilli's work.

For background, I must say that I am an associate, shareholder and project manager on a small but fast growing Chilean Company of technological development, through which we have become partners or stockholders of some relatively large companies that we have helped to develop from technological innovation projects. As a constant part of our business consist on identifying breakthrough technologies to solve industrial problems for generating new growth and investment opportunities, we are of course now oriented to developing and or licensing technologies in the field of energy supply.

In the process of gathering and researching new discoveries offering commercial potential, I became aware of Dr. Santilli's work and the magnegas concept. I developed then a personal interest on the subject and researched all of the claims made, thinking on the potential opportunity for licensing the technology for our Chilean Domestic market, specially regarding the fact that we already pay more than US$5 per gallon of gasoline.

My comment about your article pertains specifically to what I think are important issues that were perhaps omitted about Dr. Santilli's work. The main issue is that the commercial efficiency of the process is over 100% in the sense that if you account for the electrical energy input required to produce a certain amount of magnegas, the energy stored in the produced magnegas is roughly at least 160% and up to 200%, and that does not consider the heat production of the process (considering it, efficiency goes up to 300%). Dr. Santilli's theoretical work indicates that the "excess energy" is probably explainable because the strong magnetic field created by the plasma arc, the one that reduces the electronic probable position from a spherical space around the atomic nucleus to a toroidal one, constitutes in itself an intermediate form of atomic fusion that releases more energy than it takes to induce. If you take in consideration this important part of the picture, it results that the magnegas production in the hadronic reactor is actually not only using cheap wastes, but also contributing to create a very cheap fuel for automotive uses. Dr. Santilli also suggest that is possible to build a self sustainable hadronic reactor (meaning that it could employ the same magnegas produced to generate the electricity required for the plasma arc, with a proper and efficient gas turbine), thus making the process run completely outside and independent from the energy grid.

All what I am mentioning is stated by Dr. Santilli, in one or other way, both in colloquial and in strictly scientifically terms, throughout his web publications.

I know that a plain statement about "over unity" is quickly dismissed by mainstream scientifics, but, in this case, Dr. Santilli has developed the theories that explain the apparent "violation" of physical Laws.

I have contacted Dr. Santilli's company (several e-mails with Mrs. Ingargiola) to request pricing and capabilities of the Linear Recyclers and my company is currently developing a market study in order to assess the economical feasibility of employing our city sewage (currently 700 l/s dumped to the sea) with an Hadronic reactor to produce magnegas for Automotive (public transport) and industrial (heating, electricity production) uses. Total investment is around US$6 millions, and it requires that the fleet of vehicles to be retrofitted, but I believe the payback in terms of revenue and less environmental impact, together with the potential carbon bonuses to put on the sale, make this technology absolutely profitable and recommendable from every point of view.

I want to congratulate you on your effort to make these kind of marvelous technologies widely known, and I hope that within the following 12 months I can contact you again with an update of the development of our project.

The 12 months span I think will be enough to have the final engineering design and building project, as the major challenge is not the Magnegas production itself but the recovery of the water for agricultural and industrial purposes, as this is an extreme arid zone. Perhaps the operative plant will take some longer because of this. The current stage of our work is the market study to assess the potential of magnegas sales for automotive and industrial purposes in our area, in order to set the business case for our investor group. The current price of diesel and gasoline is the major force driving our project as our calculations based on the information provided by Magnefuels, corrected by our local energy and human resources costs, sets the variable cost for the gasoline equivalent of Magnegas at really low price that leaves a lot of commercial margin even at half the current prices.

I hope more people get interested in this technology as it really is one of the most mature and scalable I have had the opportunity to study in the Alternative fuels field, with the added advantage that requires a minor and already worldwide available adaptation from the existing internal combustion technology. Certainly a great advantage to the adoption of these technologies, for the developing countries as Chile, is the possibility of having a boost of fresh capital trough the sell of current and projected emission reduction certificates as established by the Kyoto agreement. Magnegas is an excellent way to reduce emissions via the replacement of fossil fuels and recycling of methanogenic wastes.

My Best Regards

Camilo Urbina (Camilo Andrés Urbina Alonso) <curbina {at} 123.cl >
Project Manager
ASITEC Ltd.
Chiguayante 050 Lomas de Miramar
Arica - Chile

Top 100
Magnecule-Generating Process is Over-Unity

Responding to

Feedback Comment by Camilo Urbina

See also

Top 100 Magnecule-Generating Process is Over-Unity

Responding to

Feedback Comment by Camilo Urbina

See also

Top 100
Magnecule-Generating Process is Over-Unity